CRH O'Regan System - Non-Surgical Hemorrhoid Removal 

Healthcare System Impact

The CRH O’Regan System stands to have a beneficial impact on the US healthcare system by reducing the number of patients requiring hemorrhoidectomies.  While generally considered highly effective, hemorrhoidectomy is associated with significantly more pain and complications than nonoperative techniques.

Notably, urinary retention due to edema in the tissues or spasms in the pelvic muscle has been reported to occur in about 20% of patients. 1  Moderate to intense post-procedure pain is also a major complaint.  A 2000 study found that patients treated with hemorrhoidectomy reported an average pain score of 6.5 on a scale of 1 to 10. 2

Additionally, a 2005 study found late complications of urgency (12%), continence problems (10%) or tenesmus (3%). 2  The rare but fatal complication of Fournier’s gangrene has been reported in five or more cases, 3 and a 2004 study found that reoperation due to adverse events was required in 7.6 % of hemorrhoidectomies. 4

Payor savings represent another positive impact.  Hemorrhoidectomies currently cost as much as $12,000 in the United States, with higher fees associated with patients requiring a hospital stay.  In contrast, the CRH O’Regan System costs only a fraction of that and poses a much lower risk of complications (and their attendant expense).

Similarly, our minimally invasive procedure presents several advantages over stapled hemorroidectomy, a surgical innovation initially hailed as a more appealing alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy due to reduced pain and faster recovery.  But at a reported cost of $6,500, this procedure, which also is associated with a number of complications, has not yet fully lived up to its promise.

A 2003 study of stapled hemorrhoidectomy found the return to work time was not significantly better than classical hemorrhoidectomy (10 days versus 14 days) and, more worrisome, that late complications of fecal urgency and pain occurred. 5  Another study found severe postoperative pain may occur in more than 30% of patients. 6

When compared to either surgery, the CRH O’Regan System provides a less expensive, less invasive, less painful option that reduces healthcare costs as well as lost wages.   Long-term research is needed, but the 2005 large scale study of our method also suggests that it may equal or better the low recurrence rate associated with hemorrhoidectomy. 7



1 Kodner IF (2002). Operative management of hemorrhoids section of anal procedures. In DW Wilmore et al., eds., ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice, vol. 1, pp. 843–848. New York: WebMD
2 Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-5.
3 Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N et al.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):29-35.
4 Gurfinkel R, Slovik Y, Glezinger R et al.  Fournier's gangrene as a delayed complication of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Harefuah. 2005 Jun;144(6):394-6, 456, 455.
5 Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H et al.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1824-36.
6 Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Apr;46(4):491-7.
7 Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000 Aug 26;356:730-3.